Why Dr. Donna Campbell Will Win the TX District 25 Primary, and Why She Should

Likeability.

“I have a lot of respect for Dr. Campbell’s integrity and truthfulness. I have not found one time when Dr. Campbell said something about me that’s not true.” ~ State Senator Jeff Wentworth, Austin American Statesman, May 2012

I showed up rather late to the Texas Senate District 25 race, having just moved to the area this Spring. Initially, I donated a nominal amount to Elizabeth Ames Jones, based on her campaign literature, and at the advice of my realtor who was a personal friend of hers. At the time, I wasn’t even registered to vote in Texas yet.

After the primary results showed Jones coming in last place, I put more effort into learning about the two candidates that would face in the run-off. I met both at the Kendall County Republican Women’s Club luncheon in June, where I found Wentworth to be rather stiff and Campbell anything but. Campbell bounced from table to table with energy and enthusiasm, squeezing my hand tightly when introducing herself and looking me right in the eye.  When I told her I had helped start a tea party group back in Virginia, she abruptly stopped squeezing my hand – and gave me a hug.

In contrast, Senator Wentworth sat at the front table, and let people come to him.  As I was leaving, I went to Wentworth’s table and introduced myself as a new resident in his District. His tepid response bordered on disinterest. Usually you’d expect a question or two from a candidate, even if their eyes dart around looking for more “important” folks, — but, I registered pretty much nothing. 

I saw Campbell later at the Boerne Tea Party meeting, where she sat in the crowd like a normal person. I’ve seen how politicians operate. Lots of times they stand around, surrounded by staffers as if they’re something special. Not Donna Campbell. I was impressed by that, as well as the positions taken per campaign literature, and based on my meeting with Wentworth, too, it motivated me to donate $100 bucks to her campaign.

A couple of weeks ago I attended a meet the candidates night at Kronkosky Place in Boerne, arriving early. Not knowing a soul, I was uncomfortable doing the pre-dinner gossip circuit, so I found an empty table, sitting by myself for 5 minutes, until a group of three joined me. Turned out they were Wentworth’s staffers. We engaged in easy conversation; his staffers were all very young, attractive and sociable. I asked one of them, who sat next to me, why she chose to commit so much of her time to work for Wentworth.

“Because he listens to his constituents, and then gets things done,” was her earnest response.  I recognized that as Wentworth’s campaign slogan, it’s on his yard signs. And it is a good thing, no doubt, listening to the voters and getting them results out of Austin.  A clear, simple message that shows an understanding of what people want to hear: Dude – You work, For me.

Wentworth spoke at the meeting that night, Campbell was at another meeting. Passion is a good thing, he said at one point, but experience is better. (Wentworth’s experience: Seven terms as State Senator. Campbell is an Emergency Room physician.)

“What did you think?” asked the Wentworth staffer, after he spoke.

“I thought it was pretty good.  I like that he co-authored the Photo Voter ID bill,” I told her.  True that.  And then I admitted that I had given a small amount of money to Campbell, and that I hadn’t heard anything fron Wentworth that would cause me to change my support.  Isn’t Passion a sign that you think your job is important, and that you are giving it everything you’ve got? 

At that point, the staffter threw up the question about Campbell’s residency, the  supposed “fact” that Campbell was renting a home in the district just to run for State Senate.  And all that.

Gosh and wow, I said. “How much does a State Senator make in Texas?” I asked the group.

“$7,200 a year,” I learned.

OK. Let’s get real.  Donna Campbell is a physician.  She obviously isn’t running because $7,200 a year is going to change her lifestyle.  She’s running for a bigger purpose, because she has seen firsthand how “experience” in government is often a metaphor for crony-capitalism and good old boy, politics as usual.  That kind of governance does not equal good governance.

Maybe it’s because I just moved to San Antonio, but the Carpetbagger trump card that Wentworth is desperate to play —  it’s as phony an issue as his claims about Campbell’s supposedly “phony” residency. (He also tried to play that card against Ames Jones, it is one of his favorites, I guess.)   If voters are looking for representation, and Campbell is engaging, warm, enthusiastic, smart, accomplished, and shares their views, isn’t that what matters?  Consider this:  if a guy has served 7 terms as a state senator, earning $7,200 a year, who do you think really has his ear by now – and do they live in his District?

Then this came out:

State Sen. Jeff Wentworth personally apologized to his GOP re-election opponent, Dr. Donna Campbell, for releasing opposition research regarding her husband that she called trashy, tawdry, sleazy and out of bounds.

Wentworth called disclosure of a 1985 DWI conviction before their marriage a “regrettable incident” in the July 31 runoff campaign.

Wentworth’s hit piece referred to a 25 year old incident relating to Campbell’s husband, 15 years before they were married, which has got to make the record books for the most desperate campaign hit in modern times.   In fact it is so “out of bounds”  – not to mention irrelevant – that it should disqualify Wentworth completely in voters’ minds.  Is Wentworth the kind of person they can trust, or just another sleazy politician using the power of incumbency to keep his seat?

Seriously  — what kind of person puts together a 29 page “dossier” about their political opponent in a state senate race?

Campbell handled Wenworth’s flailing in a classy way, showing an understanding that voters are sick of the political gamesmanship:

She said she didn’t do any “personal” opposition research on Wentworth and wouldn’t have known what to do with any damaging information.

“This race is about issues,” she said. “It’s not about Mr. Wentworth’s closet or anybody else’s,” she said.

It comes down to this.  Donna Campbell is an accomplished physician who has seen first hand the failure of our government to deal with the influx of illegal immigrants in our hospitals, and gaming of the Medicaid system.  She is a hard worker, proven by her willingness to hit the road on the campaign trail after a full shift in the emergency room.  She relates to the grassroots, and they relate to her.

She is honest. Even Wentworth praises her for that.

And she’s not a big jerk.

I’m thinking that when Wentworth loses his Senate seat, he can add a new career doing private investigative work for people who are getting married. He will dig up all the dirty dirt you need to know about your betrothed. Once he’s told you about it, if it is completely irrelevant, you won’t have to pay for it.  But you’ll still know it, of course.

 

,

Go Here Too!

Also Follow Me on:

5 Comments on “Why Dr. Donna Campbell Will Win the TX District 25 Primary, and Why She Should”

  1. Tara Says:

    I met Senator Wentworth at a function for a Republican group, and as I was walking out the door, Wentworth saw my Donna Campbell sticker, stopped me at the door and said, “IF you were a smart woman, you would change your vote”. I AM a smart woman and that is why I am not voting for you Mr. Wentworth!! GO DONNA!!!!!!!!!

    Like

    Reply

  2. John Boddie Says:

    I think you make a good observation here.

    Senator Wentworth is correct that there is value in experience, but unless that experience is used in a manner that actively engages the people he represents, it is more appropriate to the workings of the Texas Senate than it is to his constituents.

    I’m a strong supporter of term limits for two reasons:

    1. They retard the growth of a mentality that is focused inward toward the workings of government and the attendant rewards that accumulate with public office. It’s a bit like bankers and managers in industry who come to concentrate more on their bonuses than their customers.

    2. Being in a position where getting re-elected is not a consideration, political constraints on doing the best for the people an officeholder represents are not so pressing as to stifle independent action.

    Like

    Reply

    • Sara for America Says:

      I go back and forth with the term limits thing. There are some who do a great job in office, why should they be replaced with someone perhaps less qualified if the constituents are happy with the job they are doing. And what is the appropriate point of limitation? There needs to be some continuity and wisdom for leadership purposes.

      Wouldn’t a politician be just as likely to want to take the money from lobbyists – knowing they don’t have to run for re-election – as they would want to represent constituents? Just not sure the answer is that cut and dried.

      But it is ridiculous, SO RIDICULOUS, to have men who are well into their 80s, having been in the same position for 20+ years, still “serving”…. there’s a point they need to let go. And if they won’t, why their constituents still re-elect them is a mystery.

      As far as Wentworth goes, he just seems to be focused on other things other than his constituents and it shows. Experience is less important to me at his level than it would be for, say, a US Senator, who serves six years and deals with foreign policy.

      Like

      Reply

  3. John Boddie Says:

    Term limits do have a cost in terms of cutting service for some truly talented legislators and executives, but the system we have now is guided largely by the “old hands” whose motto seems to be “this is the way things have always worked.”

    I think we both agree with the idea of “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” but our legislative processes at both the national and state level are broken and term limits may be the most expeditious way of kicking of some needed changes.

    Given the current affection for “career politicians,” this might be a good time to start.

    Like

    Reply

    • Sara for America Says:

      True, but again, I wonder what new problems we would create. I’m thinking that the behind the scenes staff would become even more important than they are today, and lobbyists – same thing. There would reside the real power, because knowledge is power.

      I don’t know. Trust me, I share the kick all the bums out mentality – if only it were that easy!

      Like

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: